Editorial policy

Useful guidance before search-engine visibility

The planning journal is written around specific tasks: preparing an upload, measuring a room, comparing arrangements, or checking a generated wall model. The aim is to help a reader complete that task with a clear understanding of the inputs and limitations.

Articles should provide distinct examples and practical checks. Closely related keyword variations are grouped into one useful topic instead of being published as several near-identical pages. Page length follows the explanation needed, rather than a target word count.

Sources and product claims

Statements about 3D House Maker should match the working product. Upload limits, supported formats, exports, and retention behaviour should be checked against the implementation. We do not present unimplemented features, invented customer counts, fabricated reviews, or unperformed tests as facts.

Technical and search guidance uses primary documentation where appropriate. Google Search Central's helpful content guidance, spam policies, and localized-version documentation inform the publication process. Following guidance is not a ranking guarantee or a Google certification.

Images and examples

AI-generated editorial images are labelled conceptual illustrations. They are not actual converter outputs, measured drawings, or proof that an architectural design can be built. Numerical examples are illustrative unless explicitly identified as measurements from a real documented project.

Images are delivered as compressed WebP files with descriptive filenames and alternative text. Alternative text describes the relevant subject rather than repeating a list of search keywords.

Language versions

Machine translation can introduce awkward wording and technical errors. Such versions carry a review label, and important measurements or instructions should be compared with the English source. A language selector is not counted as a translated article: a language version must contain an actual translated body.

Editors can correct individual language versions in the dashboard. Published pages awaiting review remain noindex even when global indexing is later enabled. Language alternates should point only to existing versions of the same content.

Review before indexing

During development, the whole site is noindex. Before allowing indexing, review product accuracy, links, translations, image descriptions, mobile usability, and the distinction between conceptual advice and building documentation. The dashboard records each article's draft/published status and review state separately.

Changes to an article should update its modification date when the content changes meaningfully. Administrative storage keeps previous versions for recovery. Corrections should address the underlying claim, including related translations when affected, rather than only changing the visible English sentence.